This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
python:index [2015/11/25 14:06] admin [Animation] |
python:index [2021/10/25 08:53] (current) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
===== Animation ===== | ===== Animation ===== | ||
25. 11. [[python: | 25. 11. [[python: | ||
- | * [[https:// | + | * [[http:// |
- | * [[https:// | + | * [[http:// |
- | * [[https:// | + | * [[http:// |
+ | * [[http:// | ||
* [[http:// | * [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
===== Interactive ===== | ===== Interactive ===== | ||
18. 11. | 18. 11. | ||
[[python: | [[python: | ||
- | {{: | + | {{: |
===== IPython and notebooks ===== | ===== IPython and notebooks ===== | ||
Line 48: | Line 52: | ||
show() | show() | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | {{: | + | {{: |
===== python Q&A ===== | ===== python Q&A ===== | ||
Line 78: | Line 82: | ||
* konverze typu souboru (utf vs. iso, vs. unix vs. dos), info o souboru, vložení bílého znaku, smazání bílého znaku. | * konverze typu souboru (utf vs. iso, vs. unix vs. dos), info o souboru, vložení bílého znaku, smazání bílého znaku. | ||
- | | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | >>> | ||
+ | The Zen of Python, by Tim Peters | ||
+ | |||
+ | Beautiful is better than ugly. | ||
+ | Explicit is better than implicit. | ||
+ | Simple is better than complex. | ||
+ | Complex is better than complicated. | ||
+ | Flat is better than nested. | ||
+ | Sparse is better than dense. | ||
+ | Readability counts. | ||
+ | Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules. | ||
+ | Although practicality beats purity. | ||
+ | Errors should never pass silently. | ||
+ | Unless explicitly silenced. | ||
+ | In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess. | ||
+ | There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it. | ||
+ | Although that way may not be obvious at first unless you're Dutch. | ||
+ | Now is better than never. | ||
+ | Although never is often better than *right* now. | ||
+ | If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad idea. | ||
+ | If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea. | ||
+ | Namespaces are one honking great idea -- let's do more of those! | ||
+ | >>> | ||
+ | </ |